Vest Biogass
A brownfield plant in Hornindal, taken from engineering into production. One person answered for scope, schedule, cost and risk. That was the job, and it was me.
- Size
- 150k t/yr
- Where
- Norway
- Year
- 2026
I'm Saras. I make big industrial projects legible — ten years of schedules, cost and risk, the last four in Norway — thirty-odd moving projects turned into something a board can decide on rather than argue with.
The numbers
I've held the controls at every one of these stages, not just the comfortable middle. Plenty of people meet me at the money decision and are surprised I'm still there when the plant is running.
The route
Work
Study
Scale expands toward today
Pick a bar above
Two of these bars are shorter than the others. That is not a gap — it is part-time work running alongside a full-time degree, twice.
The work
A brownfield plant in Hornindal, taken from engineering into production. One person answered for scope, schedule, cost and risk. That was the job, and it was me.
The greenfield twin. Nothing to inherit, so the cost and schedule case had to be built to survive being questioned by people seeing it for the first time.
A £10M modification in Denmark. The resource model I built for it outlived the project — the whole portfolio planned on it afterwards.
Moved the company off Omega PIMS and trained fifty-odd people in person and remotely — planning, resources, capacity, document control, asset management — so it stopped paying consultants to run its own system.
Thirty-plus projects, a dozen live at any moment, four sites, three countries — reported so a board could decide instead of debating whose number was right.
Engineering in Oslo and production in Denmark disagreed on when to execute. I interviewed both sides, wrote the comparison without picking a winner, and handed the executives the call.
A new plant and an R&D programme, side by side, planned with different methods on purpose. One plan pretending to fit both would have failed later instead of now.
A high-voltage substation bay from drawings to handover, owner-side, on a live site — where being wrong costs more than a revised forecast.
Six years, twenty-plus projects, revenue up 128% a year for three years running. I handed it to family when I left for Norway and it carried on without me.
A data centre from nothing, and a hospital wing rebuilt around patients who never left the building. The sequencing was the entire job.
After hours
Nine things I've built in my own time, run on the rules I'd use at work: milestones, a decision log, a risk register, and a human sign-off before anything ships. If I wouldn't let it run unsupervised on a project, it doesn't run unsupervised here.
The main one. A project's method lives in a single place, so five tools read the same truth instead of each keeping a copy and quietly disagreeing.
Visit WeaveplaneAn operating layer for agent work. The core is frozen; only the rules on top may change — the same discipline that keeps a control system trustworthy.
Runs three AI models as one team and stops to ask me every time a real decision appears. It is allowed to work. It is not allowed to decide.
The forge. Picks the design method that fits the problem rather than the one I happen to like. Backed by a library of 73 notes it keeps adding to.
One playbook written once and plugged into three different AI tools, so all three work the same way instead of three ways.
The thing underneath all of it: stop retyping the same project data into five systems that each believe they are the master copy.
Turns confirmed project context into an explainable operating model instead of treating one methodology as universal.
A quiet daily job that stops everything drifting. It proposes fixes and waits. It has never been allowed to apply one on its own.
Joins retrieval, memory and consent-gated agent execution so useful context compounds without granting silent authority.
The kit
Highlighted means I owned it — set it up, migrated onto it, and taught the people who had to live with it afterwards. The rest I have simply used, which is a different and smaller claim.
My method
Audit what's actually there before proposing anything new.
Owners and dates agreed in one place, in writing.
One structure for the work, visible to everyone on it.
Start small, prove the routine works, then scale it.
Keep the reporting honest while the team does the work.
Fix the system, not the person, when something slips.
The person
Seven things — six I hold to, one I have to manage. Five were written down by people I've worked with, and their words are one section down. The other two I can only show.
Numbers people can check beat numbers people must trust.
René Ortiz wrote it downA plan should help a team decide, not just record what they did.
René again, same letterPeople contribute more when it is safe to disagree.
Jaime ArenillasSay what happened, then show the repair in the work.
Inside René’s line, one panel downA decision has to be workable and defensible.
Henrik MørkThe best managers ask what you could become, not only what you can deliver.
The one I can only show, not quoteI say yes too readily. The fix: scope the help before absorbing the whole problem.
A flaw, with its correction attachedThe test for every sentence on this page: can a stranger check it?
Not my words
Every value on the last panel that I said someone else wrote down — here it is, in their words, with their name on it. Seven quotes from six people. René managed me, so he speaks twice.
Transparency
He advocates for transparency, measurable KPIs, and clear accountability structures.
Structure that serves
How planning can support leadership decision-making rather than merely track activity.
Respect
Generous and consistently considerate of his coworkers in day-to-day interactions.
Reliability
His professionalism, reliability, and analytical mindset makes him a valuable asset.
Curiosity
A keen eye for improvements and is always looking for better ways to do things.
Lifts the team
He's sharp, hard working and dependable. A fantastic team player.
Integrity
Honest and hard working man. Very grateful to be working with you!
Let's talk
Permanent or contract, client side or consultancy. I care how a project is run, not only whether it lands: the plans are meant to be checked, the numbers are meant to be questioned, and the people who use the system are meant to be trained on it rather than handed it.
shubhamchowkse@outlook.comSix people have written recommendations. I'll share those, and the certificates, whenever you'd like.